Comments on: Trading Play-Makers for Players is Not a Long-Term Solution http://catcrave.com/2010/09/28/trading-play-makers-for-players-is-not-a-long-term-solution/ A Carolina Panthers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more. Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:52:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Mark http://catcrave.com/2010/09/28/trading-play-makers-for-players-is-not-a-long-term-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-4576 Mark Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:28:59 +0000 http://catcrave.com/?p=3565#comment-4576 I don't think trading players is the answer. I think we have the talent needed to win,we showed what was possible last year when we are operating on 8 cylinders. I think we need a new infusion at the HC position,Fox has done a great job,look at what he took over. But he has done all he can do. I don’t think trading players is the answer. I think we have the talent needed to win,we showed what was possible last year when we are operating on 8 cylinders. I think we need a new infusion at the HC position,Fox has done a great job,look at what he took over. But he has done all he can do.

]]> By: John http://catcrave.com/2010/09/28/trading-play-makers-for-players-is-not-a-long-term-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-4574 John Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:43:49 +0000 http://catcrave.com/?p=3565#comment-4574 Peppers has 3 tackles and 1 sack. For what he is getting paid that doesn't seem so great to me really. Anyway I agree that you can't trade Smith because if you do you now have to fill your #1 WR and #2 WR. We haven't really shown any consistent ability in this area. I say we don't take that bet. However if you could trade 1 of the top 2 RBs and really get something, a first rounder and a second rounder perhaps. I have to say that would be hard to turn down. Especially when that might give us two first rounders this year. That could be a lot of much needed talent going forward. I think Goodson can be the second guy to either and we also have Sutton who has run well in the past. Peppers has 3 tackles and 1 sack. For what he is getting paid that doesn’t seem so great to me really.

Anyway I agree that you can’t trade Smith because if you do you now have to fill your #1 WR and #2 WR. We haven’t really shown any consistent ability in this area. I say we don’t take that bet. However if you could trade 1 of the top 2 RBs and really get something, a first rounder and a second rounder perhaps. I have to say that would be hard to turn down. Especially when that might give us two first rounders this year. That could be a lot of much needed talent going forward. I think Goodson can be the second guy to either and we also have Sutton who has run well in the past.

]]> By: Tweets that mention Trading Play-Makers for Players is Not a Long-Term Solution | Cat Crave | A Carolina Panthers blog -- Topsy.com http://catcrave.com/2010/09/28/trading-play-makers-for-players-is-not-a-long-term-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-4571 Tweets that mention Trading Play-Makers for Players is Not a Long-Term Solution | Cat Crave | A Carolina Panthers blog -- Topsy.com Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:53:44 +0000 http://catcrave.com/?p=3565#comment-4571 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Carolina Panthers, Hot About NFL, M.Andrew Kornegay, BertromavichEdenburg, Shannon Owens and others. Shannon Owens said: RT @THECatCrave: CatCrave Trading Play-Makers for Players is Not a Long-Term Solution: I have to agree to some point wi... http://bit.ly/aOuj91 #thecatcrave [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Carolina Panthers, Hot About NFL, M.Andrew Kornegay, BertromavichEdenburg, Shannon Owens and others. Shannon Owens said: RT @THECatCrave: CatCrave Trading Play-Makers for Players is Not a Long-Term Solution: I have to agree to some point wi… http://bit.ly/aOuj91 #thecatcrave [...]

]]>