<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cat Crave &#187; NFL week 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catcrave.com/tag/nfl-week-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catcrave.com</link>
	<description>A Carolina Panthers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Week Five: Power Rankings</title>
		<link>http://catcrave.com/2012/10/02/nfl-week-five-power-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://catcrave.com/2012/10/02/nfl-week-five-power-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Dye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fanzone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL power rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL week 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcrave.com/?p=7761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First, don&#8217;t be confused that I changed the &#8220;week&#8221; to five from four in the title &#8211; I decided to use week five since that&#8217;s the week we&#8217;re in after the Monday night game is played and the power rankings reflect completed games from week four&#8230;thus, carrying their rankings into the following week. Got it? [...]</p><p><a href="http://catcrave.com/2012/10/02/nfl-week-five-power-rankings/">NFL Week Five: Power Rankings</a> - <a href="http://catcrave.com">Cat Crave</a> - <a href="http://catcrave.com">Cat Crave - A Carolina Panthers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, don&#8217;t be confused that I changed the &#8220;week&#8221; to five from four in the title &#8211; I decided to use week five since that&#8217;s the week we&#8217;re in after the Monday night game is played and the power rankings reflect completed games from week four&#8230;thus, carrying their rankings into the following week. Got it? Great.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how an early-season power rankings list generated soooo much criticism last week. Yes, I admit, I had the Jets ranked way too high but early-season rankings, AGAIN, are much like college top-25 polls in September. They often bear little resemblance to the final ones anyway, so why bother?</p>
<p>The reason I bother is to keep evaluating teams after each week&#8230;and only after the first few weeks are complete to have some data points to actually look at. The same people that gave me a hard time over the Jets were also giving me a hard time over ranking the Vikings as high as I did &#8211; at #22 &#8211; and for ranking St. Louis, Indy and Miami &#8211; at 20, 22 and 23 respectively &#8211; higher than the 27th-ranked Lions.</p>
<p>Anyone changed their mind yet?</p>
<p>The Vikings beat those same Lions (as I predicted), the Rams beat the Seahawks (again, as I predicted) and the Dolphins lost at undefeated Arizona in overtime by 3 points. I actually had the &#8216;fins pulling off a 3-point upset and it took a 4th and long TD pass from Kevin Kolb to force overtime then a turnover by the Dolphins on a floppy Tannehill pass as he was hit to set up the Cards&#8217; game-winning field goal. The Dolphins could easily be 3-1 but lost consecutive games in overtime so they&#8217;re competing. The Lions needed to draft defense this past April so, naturally, they used their top two picks on OT Riley Reiff and WR Ryan Broyles. </p>
<p>Also, people just won&#8217;t be used to seeing the Steelers ranked so low. However they&#8217;re 1-2 with a loss to the Raiders and without their two best defenders (James Harrison and Troy Polamalu), top RB (Mendenhall), and top draft pick (DeCastro) so there are several reasons for the disrespect. Polamalu&#8217;s the key to their D, so they should improve when they get him back. The bye week came at a good time for them this year.</p>
<p>Cincy has only one loss but hasn&#8217;t beaten a team with a winning record since before Dalton and Green arrived. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s this week&#8217;s list after all the week four games are in:</p>
<p>1) Houston Texans<br />
2) Atlanta Falcons<br />
3) San Francisco 49′ers<br />
4) Baltimore Ravens<br />
5) Arizona Cardinals<br />
6) Denver Broncos<br />
7) San Diego Chargers<br />
8) New England Patriots<br />
9) Philadelphia Eagles<br />
10) Cincinnati Bengals<br />
11) Green Bay Packers<br />
12) New York Giants<br />
13) Dallas Cowboys<br />
14) Minnesota Vikings<br />
15) Chicago Bears<br />
16) St. Louis Rams<br />
17) Pittsburgh Steelers<br />
18) Washington Redskins<br />
19) Seattle Seahawks<br />
20) Tampa Bay Buccaneers<br />
21) Carolina Panthers<br />
22) New York Jets<br />
23) Buffalo Bills<br />
24) Miami Dolphins<br />
25) Indianapolis Colts<br />
26) New Orleans Saints<br />
27) Tennessee Titans<br />
28) Detroit Lions<br />
29) Kansas City Chiefs<br />
30) Cleveland Browns<br />
31) Jacksonville Jaguars<br />
32) Oakland Raiders</p>
<p>Fire away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://catcrave.com/2012/10/02/nfl-week-five-power-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 7/14 queries in 0.040 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 367/380 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: catcrave.com @ 2013-05-20 23:48:36 by W3 Total Cache -->